![]() When it comes to sound quality Audirvana easily bests the Tidal and Qobuz players and the Windows player isn’t even in the same universe. Audirvana Studio integrates my three sources quite handily with the only a few problems that have been solved along the way. The audiophile player software Audirvana has now been retrofitted with the so far missing features in the version for windows: Version 3.5 of Audirvana for Windows 10 is now available as a free update for all owners of the previous Windows version. I deliberately asked it this way to invoke responses from others who disagree. I also compared it to the Windows Media Player I had been using for my local library. The audiophile player software optimizes DSD streaming to network players. Now, the French company (re-)introduces a one-time-purchase version, which does not include access to streaming content.ĭamien Plisson and his team have added numerous new features to the player software, turning it into Audirvana Studio – and changed the business model to be subscription-based.Ĭomplete with the apps for iOS and Android, Audirvana will cost about 98 Euros in the future. With "Audirvana Studio", the player software "Audirvana" switched to being a subscription sevice last year. Many claim that one sound better than the other and mostly that Audirvana has a better performance. ![]() as the competent design takes care of that. Yes, having a competently designed, transparent DAC helps, but I wouldn't concern myself with clock speeds, jitter, etc. All changes are not only included in the subscription version Audirvana Studio, but also in "Audirvana Origin", the one-time-purchase version, which can only access locally stored music, not Qobuz and Tidal. While there may be some subtle differences in the sound quality due to their various processing engines, they will be just that when the processing is kept to an absolute minimum. Audirvana 2.0 saves settings individually for each output device.Īudirvana also offers an update for the Remote App: It can now be operated on tablets in horizontal "landscape" mode. I decided to take my time to compare both versions, something is wrong with Studio. New features also include improved gapless playback, which compensates for faulty UPnP implementations in some network players. I suggest to developer to put an option in the new AS to set the sound like the 3.5.50, so all the user can switch to new version safely. The audio analyzer function has also been further improved, according to Audirvana: it scans the piece of music during playback and determines its actual resolution, detects compressed elements and upsampling. The new studio version (1.7.2) have more details, more focus, more sound stage the traditional version (3.5.50) is more bright, the voices and the meddle-high frequency are further ahead. With this, Audirvana is now also ready for multi-room operation. In the past, Amarra even used to offer an optimization script similar to Audirvana Pluss optimization options that would disable. ![]() With the recent update to version 2.0, Audirvana can stream not only to UPnP-compatible network players, but also to Chromecast devices, at up to 24-bit and 96 kHz resolution. ![]() From now on, Chromecast can be used in conjunction with the player software Audirvana. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |